Agile vs Kanban: Tailoring Project Management Agile and Kanban are popular ways to manage work, but they fit different needs. Agile is a broad family of methods that focus on people, collaboration, and flexible plans. Kanban is a visual system that helps teams limit work in progress and improve flow. You can use them separately or together. The goal is to match how your team works with how the work arrives. ...
Git Workflows for Teams: Branching, Reviews, and Merges Git work is easier when teams agree on a simple flow. This guide outlines a practical pattern that fits many projects. It emphasizes clear branching, timely reviews, and careful merges to keep the codebase stable and easy to understand. Branching strategy A strong rule is to keep main always production-ready. Feature work happens in short-lived branches named feature/xxx. When a feature is done, open a pull request against main. For bigger changes, use a release branch to prepare testing and docs. Hotfix branches handle urgent fixes and are merged back into both main and release lines. ...
Version control best practices for teams Version control is a key tool for any software team. With clear rules, engineers can work in parallel and still keep a clean history. The following practices are practical and widely useful, no matter how small or large your team is. Clear branching and workflow Keep the main branch as the deployable source. It should always build and pass tests. Create short-lived feature branches for new work. Aim for a few days of work, not weeks. Use release or hotfix branches when you need to fix or roll out urgent changes. Name branches consistently, for example: feature/login, fix/payment-bug, or release/1.2.0. Commit hygiene Write small, focused commits that capture one idea or fix. Use meaningful messages that explain why the change was made. Consider a simple format: type(scope): description. Examples: feat(auth): add login with OAuth fix(ui): align login button docs(contributing): update how to run tests Code review and pull requests Require at least one or two reviewers. Quick, constructive feedback beats long delays. Link PRs to issues and add a short summary of the change. Run tests and lint checks before asking for a review. Keep PRs small and self-contained. Use a clear PR checklist and assign owners for follow-up. Automation and hygiene Use continuous integration to verify changes on PRs. Protect important branches; require passing checks and approved reviews. Maintain a clean repository with .gitignore and, if needed, Git LFS for large files. Consider pre-commit hooks to catch simple issues before saving commits. Choosing a model and merge strategy A simple model like GitHub Flow fits many teams: work on feature branches, then merge into main after review. Decide on a merge strategy that suits your history goals: preserve context with merge commits, keep history tidy with squash, or rebase for linear history. Align the policy with your tooling and release cadence. Getting started for teams Pick a branching rule set and write a short guide for newcomers. Create a PR template and a basic review checklist. Train the team on writing good commit messages and using the review process. Review and adjust the policy after a few sprints. If you use GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket, tailor these tips to your platform. The goal is a smooth, predictable workflow that helps everyone contribute confidently. ...