Serverless Architectures: Pros, Cons and Patterns Serverless architectures place most operational tasks in managed services. You deploy code as small units, often functions, and the cloud provider handles servers, capacity, and maintenance. This model is popular for APIs, data processing, and automation because it adapts to demand and can reduce idle costs.
Pros Cost efficiency: pay per execution, not for idle servers. Automatic scaling: capacity matches traffic. Faster delivery: small, composable services speed up experiments. Reduced maintenance: you focus on code, not servers. Easy experimentation: try new features with minimal setup. Cons Cold starts: an idle function may add latency at first request. Vendor lock-in: moving to another provider can be hard. Testing and local development: emulating cloud services can be tricky. Observability: tracing across many services needs care. Limits and SLA: functions have max execution time and resource caps. Patterns to consider Event-driven functions: respond to messages, storage events, or API calls. API backend: a gateway routes requests to serverless handlers. Orchestration: use a state machine to coordinate steps. Data pipelines: stream processing and scheduled batch jobs. Scheduling: cron-like tasks for backups or reports. Edge functions: light compute near users for latency improvements. Guidance for teams Use serverless for variable workloads, fast MVPs, and services with clean boundaries. Avoid for long-running tasks, steady heavy load, or strict regulatory controls without safeguards. Design for resilience: idempotent handlers, retries with backoff, and dead-letter queues. Invest in observability: structured logs, metrics, traces, and clear success criteria. Plan cost governance: monitor per-function costs and data transfer. Example scenario
...