Serverless Architectures: Pros, Cons, and Applications Serverless architectures let developers deploy code without managing servers. In practice, functions run in managed runtimes that scale automatically in response to demand. This model, often called function as a service (FaaS), pairs with other managed services to build complete apps. It can speed up delivery and reduce operations work.
What makes serverless appealing You pay only for actual usage, not idle capacity. Services scale automatically, handling sudden traffic without manual tuning. Operations are lighter, so teams focus on product features rather than server maintenance. Development can be faster: small, independent functions map well to agile workflows. Drawbacks to consider Cold starts can add latency at low or sporadic traffic, affecting some user experiences. Vendor lock-in is real; moving to another cloud or platform may require rewriting code and configurations. Less control over the runtime environment and dependencies. Local testing and end-to-end debugging can be harder without the full service stack. Costs can rise unexpectedly if activity spikes or if multiple functions run often. Common applications HTTP APIs and webhooks using API gateways and functions to handle requests quickly. Data processing pipelines, such as real-time event streams that react to file uploads or messages. Scheduled tasks and cron jobs for reports, cleanups, or backups. Real-time processing like image or video resizing as soon as data arrives. Lightweight microservices that handle specific tasks without managing servers. Example: a photo sharing site uses a function triggered by a storage upload to generate thumbnails, then stores results in a database. This pattern keeps compute costs tied to actual work and reduces operational overhead.
...